Journal Articles

It is time to unlearn certain boundaries of what sustainability looks like: in a world where the most progressive states actively promote these unproblematized visions of idyllic sustainability, where can our hope be for reconstructing a better future on the basis of actual sustainability challenges?
We examine firms with a dual-class share structure where insiders (officers and directors) have voting control over the firm that exceeds their ownership stake. We find that when these insiders have significantly more voting control, their firms demonstrate poorer, rather than better, environmental performance.
We examine two charities (a museum and a disability rights organization) that were in breach of  this soft regulation; however, we suggest each faced different levels of reputational risk by doing so. We argue that charities are most at risk of being perceived as acting inappropriately when they breach regulations that are aimed at financial propriety.